2001 Acura RL vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Acura RL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Acura RL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Acura RL has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Acura RL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura RL | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | RL | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |