2001 Acura RSX vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Acura RSX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2001 Acura RSX. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 853 kg more than 2001 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Acura RSX | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | RSX | 62 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 79 L |
