2001 Acura RSX vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Acura RSX would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2001 Acura RSX. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2001 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 708 kg more than 2001 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Acura RSX. (192 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura RSX | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Acura | Dodge |
Model | RSX | Ram |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 76 L |