2001 Acura RSX vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Acura RSX would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura RSX (191 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2001 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura RSX | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Acura | Smart |
Model | RSX | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1867 mm |