2001 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2001 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Alfa Romeo 146 (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Alfa Romeo 146 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Alfa Romeo 146 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Alfa Romeo 146. (124 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Alfa Romeo 146.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 146 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1370 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 57 L |