2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri vs. 1982 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 495 kg more than 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri.
Because 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri | 1982 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Centauri | DeVille |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3090 mm |