2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri.
Because 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri (260 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Alfa Romeo Centauri | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | Centauri | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2619 mm |
