2001 Ariel Atom vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Ariel Atom is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2001 Ariel Atom. (109 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ariel Atom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1570 kg more than 2001 Ariel Atom. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ariel Atom | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Ariel | Cadillac |
| Model | Atom | 62 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3300 mm |
