2001 Ascari Ecosse vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2001 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,721 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ascari Ecosse (395 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ascari Ecosse weights approximately 113 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 515 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2001 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ascari Ecosse | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Ascari | Holden |
Model | Ecosse | EJ |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4721 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 678 Nm | 163 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1480 mm |