2001 Ascari Ecosse vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota

To start off, 2001 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,721 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ascari Ecosse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Dakota. (576 Nm). This means 2001 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Dakota.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ascari Ecosse 2000 Dodge Dakota
Make Ascari Dodge
Model Ecosse Dakota
Year Released 2001 2000
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 4721 cc 4699 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 395 HP 0 HP
Torque 678 Nm 576 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1130 mm 1670 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]