2001 Ascari Ecosse vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ascari Ecosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ascari Ecosse would be higher. At 4,721 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ascari Ecosse (395 HP) has 325 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ascari Ecosse weights approximately 503 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 576 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2001 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ascari Ecosse | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ascari | MCC |
Model | Ecosse | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 4721 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 102 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1520 mm |