2001 Ascari Ecosse vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ascari Ecosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ascari Ecosse would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 548 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2001 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 2001 Ascari Ecosse has manual transmission. 2001 Ascari Ecosse will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ascari Ecosse | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Ascari | Smart |
Model | Ecosse | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1542 mm |