2001 Audi A2 vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Audi A2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2001 Audi A2. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 260 kg more than 2001 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi A2 (230 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2001 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi A2 | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | A2 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1422 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
