2001 Audi A2 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2001 Audi A2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2001 Audi A2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi A2 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi A2 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi A2 (230 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi A2 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A2 | 102 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1422 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2160 mm |