2001 Audi A2 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2001 Audi A2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2001 Audi A2. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi A2 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A2 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1422 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.9 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2510 mm |
