2001 Audi A2 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi A2 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2001 Audi A2. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1232 kg more than 2001 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi A2. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi A2 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A2 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1422 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 132 L |