2001 Audi A4 vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Audi A4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2001 Audi A4. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 464 kg more than 2001 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi A4 | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A4 | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 5424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3290 mm |