2001 Audi A4 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2001 Audi A4 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2001 Audi A4. (237 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi A4.
Because 2001 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi A4. (339 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi A4 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A4 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2001 | 1989 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 467 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2580 mm |