2001 Audi A6 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Audi A6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi A6 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi A6 (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi A6 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |