2001 Audi A6 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi A6 (296 HP) has 226 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi A6 weights approximately 1055 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi A6 (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2001 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2001 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: