2001 Audi A6 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi A6 (174 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi A6 weights approximately 955 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi A6 (370 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2001 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: