2001 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2001 Audi A6. (216 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 272 kg more than 2001 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi A6. (301 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi A6 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A6 | XTS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3123 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.5 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.5 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |