2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1952 Austin A 40
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. Both 2001 Audi AL2 and 1952 Austin A 40 are equipped with a 1,199 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi AL2 (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1952 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Audi | Austin |
| Model | AL2 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1000 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2360 mm |
