2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1954 Austin A
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin A (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin A should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A. (287 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1954 Austin A | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | AL2 | A |
Year Released | 2001 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 287 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1975 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3040 mm |