2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1955 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Singer Hunter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi AL2 (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Singer Hunter weights approximately 246 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1955 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1955 Singer Hunter has manual transmission. 1955 Singer Hunter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1955 Singer Hunter | |
| Make | Audi | Singer |
| Model | AL2 | Hunter |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1146 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2180 mm |
