2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1955 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 710 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1955 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1955 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1955 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Audi | Talbot |
Model | AL2 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1610 kg |