2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1956 Chrysler C

To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. At 5,801 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Chrysler C (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Chrysler C should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler C weights approximately 980 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1956 Chrysler C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Chrysler C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler C (560 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 1956 Chrysler C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.

Compare all specifications: