2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1960 MG Magnett
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 MG Magnett is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi AL2 (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1960 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1960 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 MG Magnett weights approximately 240 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1960 MG Magnett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG Magnett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1960 MG Magnett | |
| Make | Audi | MG |
| Model | AL2 | Magnett |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1140 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2530 mm |
