2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1961 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK X (261 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK X (390 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 1961 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1961 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | AL2 | MK X |
Year Released | 2001 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 390 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1910 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2900 mm |