2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1963 BMW 502
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 590 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 502. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 502.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1963 BMW 502 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | AL2 | 502 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3168 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1490 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2840 mm |