2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus

To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi AL2 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus.

Because 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus. (174 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus has manual transmission. 1963 Morgan Plus 4 Plus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: