2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1963 Rover P5

To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover P5 (119 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover P5 weights approximately 820 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P5. (218 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P5. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1963 Rover P5 has manual transmission. 1963 Rover P5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: