2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1964 Austin A 60
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi AL2 (75 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 60 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1964 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1964 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | AL2 | A 60 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 122 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1120 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2550 mm |