2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1964 MG MGC
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG MGC (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1964 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGC. (174 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGC. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1964 MG MGC has manual transmission. 1964 MG MGC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1964 MG MGC | |
| Make | Audi | MG |
| Model | AL2 | MGC |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
