2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1964 Reliant Rebel

To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Audi AL2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi AL2 (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Rebel. (27 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi AL2 weights approximately 379 kg more than 1964 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Reliant Rebel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Rebel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Rebel. (42 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Rebel. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1964 Reliant Rebel has manual transmission. 1964 Reliant Rebel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: