2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 240 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
Model | AL2 | Tiger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1140 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2190 mm |