2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1965 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,703 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi AL2 (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1965 Ford Zephyr. (72 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 245 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1965 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Zephyr. (128 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1965 Ford Zephyr | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | AL2 | Zephyr |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 128 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1145 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |