2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1965 Mazda R 360

To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Audi AL2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi AL2 (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi AL2 weights approximately 516 kg more than 1965 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.

Compare all specifications: