2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mercury Comet. (258 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | AL2 | Comet |
Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 258 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2950 mm |