2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1967 Austin A 40
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Audi AL2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi AL2 (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi AL2 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1967 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1967 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | AL2 | A 40 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1096 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 81 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2220 mm |