2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1970 Rover P5B
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,527 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Rover P5B (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Rover P5B weights approximately 680 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Rover P5B. (295 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Rover P5B.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1970 Rover P5B | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | AL2 | P5B |
Year Released | 2001 | 1970 |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3527 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 295 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1580 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2820 mm |