2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1972 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda RX-4 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1972 Mazda RX-4 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | AL2 | RX-4 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 165 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1110 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2520 mm |