2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi AL2 weights approximately 48 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | AL2 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 852 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |