2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1982 Bristol Beaufighter
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 850 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1982 Bristol Beaufighter | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | AL2 | Beaufighter |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1750 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2910 mm |