2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1982 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Holden Commodore (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Commodore weights approximately 260 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Commodore.

Compare all specifications: