2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (129 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 50 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (180 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Audi | Fiat |
Model | AL2 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2460 mm |