2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (98 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 5 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (131 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Audi | Fiat |
| Model | AL2 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2450 mm |
