2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1984 Buick Skylark
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Buick Skylark (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Buick Skylark weights approximately 350 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Buick Skylark. (203 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1984 Buick Skylark | |
| Make | Audi | Buick |
| Model | AL2 | Skylark |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1250 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |
