2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1985 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | AL2 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2833 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 223 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |
