2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 270 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (180 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | AL2 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2001 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1170 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2640 mm |